We Urgently Question:

  • Why we went into the first lockdown on the 23rd March 2020, when the government downgraded COVID-19 on the 19th March 2020 to the status of no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID). If it was highly dangerous, it would have maintained its HCID status.
  • Hospitals being shown as overflowing on TV news reports but found empty when checked by members of the public and called out by nurses (NHS whistleblowers).
  • Why measures beneficial to the immune system were never promoted by the government, i.e. sunlight (vitamin D), vitamin supplements or vitamin rich fruit and vegetables, regular exercise, healthy eating as opposed to fast food meals.
  • Why were successful, safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 symptoms never rolled out worldwide, instead they were withheld or destroyed?
  • The cost/benefit ratio of lockdowns on health, mental health and society.
  • If the lockdowns work, why the masks, if the masks work, why social distancing?
  • The justification of lockdowns to prevent “even one death too many” while an estimated 75,000 will die both directly and indirectly from lockdowns.
  • The reliability and validity of the PCR tests as currently being applied (over concentration of samples to achieve higher level of false positives) and the non-use of other more accurate tests.
  • The 28 days from a positive test death statistic method introduced for the first time with COVID-19.
  • The relabeling of other deaths to Covid-19 [John Hopkins University newsletter ref needed]
  • The need for ID2020 digital passports for a virus that has a 99.96% survival rate and inflated case numbers due to over concentration of samples in PCR testing.
  • The independence of educational institutions and media reporting organizations while receiving substantial grants from Bill Gate’s Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI alliance.
  • The safety record of Bill Gates and his foundation led vaccine programs in India and Africa. Many dead and disabled. Settled out of court.
  • Financial conflicts of interest from government, university & corporation advisors and decision makers.
  • The Swedish method (no lockdown, no masks mandate – while promoting increased hygiene and extra care for the elderly) not being applied even though their death rate per population is one of the lowest in Europe.
  • The Swedish method’s cost benefit ratio not being considered with their lower death rate, functioning economy and avoidance of lockdown related deaths.
  • The safety of mRNA vaccines with a 3-month development cycle compared to all previous vaccines with a 10-15 year development timeframe (3 years in an emergency), and why are known safe and effective treatments not been used instead of an experimental vaccine?
  • The coincidental timing of Event 201 and onset of COVID-19 a few months later.
  • How the WHO managed to declare a pandemic not based on deaths through changing the definition of a pandemic in April 2009.
  • The World Bank and IMF offering Belarus $940 million in Covid Relief Aid on condition they mandate mask wearing, impose curfews, impose a police state and crash their economy. This offer was rejected.
Read 2851 times Last modified on Thursday, 17 December 2020 23:07
More in this category: « Mission: Join Us: »